Clinical outcomes of hemodialysis patients in a public-private partnership care framework in Italy: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Innovative care models such as public-private partnerships (PPPs) may help meet the challenge of providing cost-effective high-quality care for the steadily growing and complex chronic kidney disease population since they combine the expertise and efficiency of a specialized dialysis provider with the population care approach of a public entity. We report the five-years main clinical outcomes of a population of patients treated on hemodialysis within a PPP-care model in Italy. METHODS: This descriptive retrospective cohort study consisted of all consecutive hemodialysis patients treated in the NephroCare-operated Nephrology and Dialysis unit of the Seriate Hospital in 2012-2016, which exercises a PPP-care model. Clinical and treatment information was obtained from the European Clinical Database. Hospitalization outcomes and cumulative all-cause mortality incidences that accounted for competing risks were calculated. RESULTS: We included 401 hemodialysis patients (197 prevalent and 204 incident patients) in our study. The mean cohort age and age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index were 67.0 years and 6.7, respectively. Patients were treated with online high-volume hemodiafiltration or high-flux hemodialysis. Parameters of treatment efficiency were above the recommended targets throughout the study period. Patients in the PPP experienced benefits in terms of hospitalization (average number of hospital admissions/patient-year: 0.79 and 1.13 for prevalent and incident patients, respectively; average length of hospitalization: 8.9 days for both groups) and had low cumulative all-cause mortality rates (12 months: 10.6 and 7.8%, 5 years: 42.0 and 35.9%, for prevalent and incident patients, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Results of our descriptive study suggest that hemodialysis patients treated within a PPP-care model framework received care complying with recommended treatment targets and may benefit in terms of hospitalization and mortality outcomes.

Transmembrane pressure modulation in high-volume mixed hemodiafiltration to optimize efficiency and minimize protein loss.

The aim of the present study was transmembrane pressure (TMP) modulation in high-volume mixed hemodiafiltration (HDF) to optimize efficiency and minimize protein loss. The optimal flow/pressure conditions in on-line mixed HDF assisted with a feedback control of TMP were defined in this prospective randomized study in order to obtain maximal efficiency in solute removal while minimizing potential side effects. Two different TMP profiles in mixed HDF were compared in 12 unselected patients who underwent two study periods of 2 weeks each in cross-over randomized sequence: (A) constant TMP at around 300 mmHg and (B) profiled TMP, in which TMP was slowly increased from a low initial value to the maximal value. In both procedures, the mean volume exchange was 10.6+/-1.4 l/h. Mean filtration fraction was 53%. Instantaneous beta2-microglobulin (beta2-m) clearance was higher at the start of the session with profiled TMP (207+/-35 vs 194+/-28 ml/min, P<0.005), whereas no differences were found at the end (135+/-19 vs 132+/-19 ml/min). Profiled TMP resulted in a higher mean beta2-m clearance of the session (97.0+/-15.4 vs 87.8+/-18.3 ml/min, P<0.01), in lower albumin loss in the first 30 min (0.62+/-0.14 vs 0.98+/-0.18 g, P<0.0001), and, in the whole session (3.98+/-1.19 vs 5.24+/-0.77 g, P<0.001), in higher dialyzer ultrafiltration coefficients and lower resistance indexes. This study showed that the TMP feedback modulation in mixed HDF was highly effective in maintaining very high ultrafiltration rates and filtration fractions, and minimized potential side effects as a result of the improved preservation of membrane permeability and more favorable dialyzer pressure regimen.

Kidney transplantation in patients with IgA mesangial glomerulonephritis.

BACKGROUND: Strategies for treating IgA glomerulonephritis (IgAGN) are controversial, particularly with regards to the long-term results of kidney transplantation, including the risk of recurrence of IgAGN post-transplant and the impact of this recurrence on graft survival. METHODS: The outcomes of 106 adults transplanted because of a biopsy-proven IgAGN and of 212 patients without IgAGN transplanted during the same period were analyzed. To evaluate the risk of recurrence, patients with hematuria, proteinuria, or an increase in plasma creatinine were submitted to allograft biopsy. Factors influencing recurrence and the impact of recurrence on graft survival were analyzed. RESULTS: The ten-year patient (0.93 vs. 0.92) and graft survival (0.75 vs. 0.82) probabilities were not significantly different between IgAGN patients and controls. Only plasma creatinine and proteinuria at six months were associated with an increased relative risk (RR) of graft failure (RR 2.79 and 5.94, respectively). Histological recurrence of IgA glomerulonephritis was diagnosed in 37 patients. Younger age (RR 2.63), increased plasma creatinine (RR 2.39), and proteinuria (RR 6.02) at six months were associated with the risk of recurrence. If proteinuria and plasma creatinine at six months were considered in the Cox model, IgA recurrence per se was not associated with an increased risk of graft failure (P = 0.181). The main causes of graft failure were glomerulonephritis in patients with recurrence of IgAGN and chronic rejection in patients without recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: The ten-year graft survival rate was similar in patients with IgAGN or other renal diseases. At least 35% IgAGN patients had biopsy-proven recurrence, and younger patients were more prone to the risk of recurrence. Recurrence did not affect the ten-year graft survival.